You are certainly right, Jess.
I think the reason she won't answer about the number of radiographs is that it would shock everybody on this forum.
I think the reason she won't answer about the number of patients who were and were not sub-surgical after the growth spurt is because Clear's record is IDENTICAL to natural history.
That is, it hasn't saved a single child from surgery and Smith knows it. Or she doesn't know it through lack of understanding how to crunch the data and is fooling herself by thinking the cases that would not have advanced anyway were not advancing due to Clear. Chiros are not trained in research and it shows.
I think the reason she won't answer about the number of radiographs is that it would shock everybody on this forum.
I think the reason she won't answer about the number of patients who were and were not sub-surgical after the growth spurt is because Clear's record is IDENTICAL to natural history.
That is, it hasn't saved a single child from surgery and Smith knows it. Or she doesn't know it through lack of understanding how to crunch the data and is fooling herself by thinking the cases that would not have advanced anyway were not advancing due to Clear. Chiros are not trained in research and it shows.
Comment