Originally posted by hdugger
View Post
It is naive to take this at face value and gloss over details that are known to be relevant. The details have been shown to matter.
You mention dose response. Are there more than two studies that purport to show a dose-response? Are you familiar with the criticism of one of them, Katz et al. (2010)
Is one of them BrAIST which in only to the point of "maturity" where maturity is defined as having no more than 25% of growth remaining and where "success" includes a 49* curve?
The details matter. You can't gloss over them. The ending curves are conspicuous by their absence.
Your declarations of victory remind me of all the previous declarations of victory. Do you think those were correct also? If so then why was BrAIST conducted?
Comment