Originally posted by Still Hoping
View Post
The key question is does Clear improve upon the already good track record of the natural history for curves under 25*. To show that would require a careful long term study with HUGE numbers of patients coupled with a control group that was equally huge. Clear has never done that so they can't know if they are doing better than natural history FULL STOP.
Either they don't realize this is the actual issue or they deliberately don't tell the bunnies that is the actual issue.
I'm beginning to think they would claim that Clear was the reason any and all curves under 25* did not reach surgical territory when in fact doing NOTHING will result in the same thing at NO COST either in time, money or radiation exposure.
Comment