When I have read this:
I suppose you had something important to said that and criticize what I said
In this way
But I forgot that in your limited idea about what science is, just only the testing analysis take place, so if we have not some evidence directly showing something, there is not any reason (as logical reasoning based over assumption with reasonable reliability) to believe that surely is true.
Originally posted by Pooka1
View Post
Originally posted by flerc
View Post
Originally posted by Pooka1
View Post
Comment