Look in the article I posted from Carol Wise about how scientists deal with this data set in the context of other data sets. Note they do NOT single out one that they like which is what lay people tend to do and what you continually do.
Scientists continually add new results to the old results and adjust their hypotheses. They don't pick a result they like and ignore the other studies that contradict the one study.
As I have mentioned several times before and you have yet to take on board, you seem to like this study with SELF-REPORTED data that is not in agreement with several other studies. Self reported by, wait for it... lay people. Your people. These people, you, have NO relevant training to be discussing these articles and it shows in your cherry-picking. Scientists acknowledge consensus when it exists not because it means that position is correct but because TRAINED people are leaning that way at that moment. You ignore consensus for whatever strikes your lay fantasy based on ZERO scientific training. And it shows.
Garbage in, garbage out is one explanation for the one twins study with SELF-REPORTED data. Carol Wise is more circumscribed in describing that study.
Scientists continually add new results to the old results and adjust their hypotheses. They don't pick a result they like and ignore the other studies that contradict the one study.
As I have mentioned several times before and you have yet to take on board, you seem to like this study with SELF-REPORTED data that is not in agreement with several other studies. Self reported by, wait for it... lay people. Your people. These people, you, have NO relevant training to be discussing these articles and it shows in your cherry-picking. Scientists acknowledge consensus when it exists not because it means that position is correct but because TRAINED people are leaning that way at that moment. You ignore consensus for whatever strikes your lay fantasy based on ZERO scientific training. And it shows.
Garbage in, garbage out is one explanation for the one twins study with SELF-REPORTED data. Carol Wise is more circumscribed in describing that study.
Comment