I am new to the forum and have been told by a new orthopedic surgeon that I need to go to a scoliosis specialist and have surgery after he took my case to a difficult cases conference, and they conferred about my case.
I am 67 and would like to know whether I should go to a highly rated hospital like HSS so that I don't end up with infections, etc. due to age and previous surgeries. I first had a lumbar spine surgery, then a torn meniscus surgery, then another lumbar spine surgery, and finally a partial knee replacement all in three and a half years beginning when I was 61. I am fused with screws and rods in my lumbar spine.
Or should I be looking at finding the best possible surgeon? I have heard of Dr. Baron Lonner, Dr. Lenke, Dr. Errico, also, Dr. Frank Schwab and Dr. Kim who I think both are at HSS. I worry as some hospitals aren't rated as highly as HSS.
I live in Sarasota, FL, but my surgeon recommended New York.
Thanks for any help. Hope I am posting this correctly.
Teacher Gal
QUOTE=LindaRacine;163630]I had known that Dr. Boachie was going to retire for at least a year before it actually got announced.
I'm fairly certain that every one of your surgeons has been sued, probably multiple times. The vast majority of suits have no basis. When something goes wrong and a patient has a complication or a bad outcome, everyone suffers, including the surgeons and the anesthesiologists. Most of these problems are not caused by neglect. These medical professionals can do everything in their power to protect their patients from experiencing complications, but stuff still happens. When a professional is negligent, they're at fault. If they don't take the appropriate steps to minimize the possibility of something going wrong, that's negligent. If they operate while under the influence, that's definitely negligent. Otherwise, I think we need to understand that we're just one of the unlucky ones.
How many times have you heard of surgeons telling patients that there are no guarantees? In case someone forgot, THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES. And, yes, I believe that when this patient was consented, she was probably not told that she might lose some of her sight or that she might end up in a wheelchair. It would literally take hours for our surgeons to tell us absolutely everything that might happen to us during and after surgery. And, even then, we might have a complication no one else has ever experienced. I'm not sure of this, but I believe that the risk of death is actually higher than the risk of blindness (though both are rare). The patient was almost certainly told that there was a risk of death, and yet she decided to proceed with surgery. If she had been told that there was a risk of blindness, would she have changed her mind? We are all told that these are very serious surgeries with very serious complications. Have any of you ever changed your mind about surgery because of what you were told in the consent process? Look at the list of complications at the end of this post. I'd be interested to hear from people who would specifically not have surgery because of something on the list.
A few studies of interest:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946720
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22504517
Here's a list of complications put together by the International Spine Study Group:
Infection
• Major
o Deep
o Pneumonia
o Sepsis
• Minor
o Superficial
o UTI
o C Diff infection
Implant
• Major
o Hook dislodgement
o Interbody fracture
o Interbody migration
o Rod fracture
o Rod dislodgement
o Screw fracture
• Minor
o Painful implants
o Prominence
o Screw malposition
o Interbody subsidence
o Crosslink dislodgement
o Set screw dislodgement
o Screw bone interface loosening
Radiographic
• Major
o DJK
Not requiring surgery
Requiring surgery
o PJK
Not requiring surgery
Requiring surgery
o Pseudoarthrosis
• Minor
o Coronal imbalance
o Curve decompensation
o Heterotopic ossification
o Sagittal imbalance
o Adjacent segment degeneration
Neurologic
• Major
o Visual deficit/blindness
o Brachial plexus injury
o CVA/Stroke
o Spinal cord injury with incomplete deficit
o Spinal cord injury with complete deficit
o Nerve root injury with weakness
o Retrograde ejaculation
o Bowel/Bladder deficit
• Minor
o Neuropathy or sensory deficit
o Pain (radiculopathy)
o Peripheral nerve palsy
o Delirium
Mortality
• All major
Cardiopulmonary
• Major
o Cardiac arrest
o Pulmonary embolism
o Respiratory arrest
o DVT
o Congestive heart failure
o Myocardial infarction
o Reintubation
o Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
• Minor
o Coagulopathy
o Arrhythmia
o Pleural effusion
o Hypotension
o Congestive heart failure
Vascular
• Major
o Vascular injury
• Minor
o coagulopathy
o Thrombophlebitis
Gastrointestinal
• Major
o Obstruction
o Perforation
o Bleed requiring surgery
o Pancreatitis requiring surgery
o Cholecystitis requiring surgery
o Liver Failure
o SMA Syndrome
• Minor
o Ileus
o Bleed not requiring surgical intervention
o Pancreatitis not requiring surgery
o Cholecystitis requiring surgery
Renal
• Major
o Acute Renal failure requiring dialysis
• Minor
o Acute Renal failure requiring medical intervention
Operative
• Major
o Retained sponge/instrument
o Wrong surgical level
o Unintended extension of fusion
o Vascular injury
o Visceral injury
o EBL >4L
• Minor
o Dural tear
o Fixation failure (hook/screw)
o Implant failure
o Pedicle fracture
o Posterior element fracture
o Vertebral body fracture
Wound Problems
• Major
o Dehiscence requiring surgery
o Hematoma/seroma with neurological deficit
o Hematoma/seroma, no neurological deficit requiring surgery
o Incisional hernia
• Minor
o Hematoma/seroma not requiring surgery
o Hernia[/QUOTE]
I am 67 and would like to know whether I should go to a highly rated hospital like HSS so that I don't end up with infections, etc. due to age and previous surgeries. I first had a lumbar spine surgery, then a torn meniscus surgery, then another lumbar spine surgery, and finally a partial knee replacement all in three and a half years beginning when I was 61. I am fused with screws and rods in my lumbar spine.
Or should I be looking at finding the best possible surgeon? I have heard of Dr. Baron Lonner, Dr. Lenke, Dr. Errico, also, Dr. Frank Schwab and Dr. Kim who I think both are at HSS. I worry as some hospitals aren't rated as highly as HSS.
I live in Sarasota, FL, but my surgeon recommended New York.
Thanks for any help. Hope I am posting this correctly.
Teacher Gal
QUOTE=LindaRacine;163630]I had known that Dr. Boachie was going to retire for at least a year before it actually got announced.
I'm fairly certain that every one of your surgeons has been sued, probably multiple times. The vast majority of suits have no basis. When something goes wrong and a patient has a complication or a bad outcome, everyone suffers, including the surgeons and the anesthesiologists. Most of these problems are not caused by neglect. These medical professionals can do everything in their power to protect their patients from experiencing complications, but stuff still happens. When a professional is negligent, they're at fault. If they don't take the appropriate steps to minimize the possibility of something going wrong, that's negligent. If they operate while under the influence, that's definitely negligent. Otherwise, I think we need to understand that we're just one of the unlucky ones.
How many times have you heard of surgeons telling patients that there are no guarantees? In case someone forgot, THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES. And, yes, I believe that when this patient was consented, she was probably not told that she might lose some of her sight or that she might end up in a wheelchair. It would literally take hours for our surgeons to tell us absolutely everything that might happen to us during and after surgery. And, even then, we might have a complication no one else has ever experienced. I'm not sure of this, but I believe that the risk of death is actually higher than the risk of blindness (though both are rare). The patient was almost certainly told that there was a risk of death, and yet she decided to proceed with surgery. If she had been told that there was a risk of blindness, would she have changed her mind? We are all told that these are very serious surgeries with very serious complications. Have any of you ever changed your mind about surgery because of what you were told in the consent process? Look at the list of complications at the end of this post. I'd be interested to hear from people who would specifically not have surgery because of something on the list.
A few studies of interest:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946720
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22504517
Here's a list of complications put together by the International Spine Study Group:
Infection
• Major
o Deep
o Pneumonia
o Sepsis
• Minor
o Superficial
o UTI
o C Diff infection
Implant
• Major
o Hook dislodgement
o Interbody fracture
o Interbody migration
o Rod fracture
o Rod dislodgement
o Screw fracture
• Minor
o Painful implants
o Prominence
o Screw malposition
o Interbody subsidence
o Crosslink dislodgement
o Set screw dislodgement
o Screw bone interface loosening
Radiographic
• Major
o DJK
Not requiring surgery
Requiring surgery
o PJK
Not requiring surgery
Requiring surgery
o Pseudoarthrosis
• Minor
o Coronal imbalance
o Curve decompensation
o Heterotopic ossification
o Sagittal imbalance
o Adjacent segment degeneration
Neurologic
• Major
o Visual deficit/blindness
o Brachial plexus injury
o CVA/Stroke
o Spinal cord injury with incomplete deficit
o Spinal cord injury with complete deficit
o Nerve root injury with weakness
o Retrograde ejaculation
o Bowel/Bladder deficit
• Minor
o Neuropathy or sensory deficit
o Pain (radiculopathy)
o Peripheral nerve palsy
o Delirium
Mortality
• All major
Cardiopulmonary
• Major
o Cardiac arrest
o Pulmonary embolism
o Respiratory arrest
o DVT
o Congestive heart failure
o Myocardial infarction
o Reintubation
o Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
• Minor
o Coagulopathy
o Arrhythmia
o Pleural effusion
o Hypotension
o Congestive heart failure
Vascular
• Major
o Vascular injury
• Minor
o coagulopathy
o Thrombophlebitis
Gastrointestinal
• Major
o Obstruction
o Perforation
o Bleed requiring surgery
o Pancreatitis requiring surgery
o Cholecystitis requiring surgery
o Liver Failure
o SMA Syndrome
• Minor
o Ileus
o Bleed not requiring surgical intervention
o Pancreatitis not requiring surgery
o Cholecystitis requiring surgery
Renal
• Major
o Acute Renal failure requiring dialysis
• Minor
o Acute Renal failure requiring medical intervention
Operative
• Major
o Retained sponge/instrument
o Wrong surgical level
o Unintended extension of fusion
o Vascular injury
o Visceral injury
o EBL >4L
• Minor
o Dural tear
o Fixation failure (hook/screw)
o Implant failure
o Pedicle fracture
o Posterior element fracture
o Vertebral body fracture
Wound Problems
• Major
o Dehiscence requiring surgery
o Hematoma/seroma with neurological deficit
o Hematoma/seroma, no neurological deficit requiring surgery
o Incisional hernia
• Minor
o Hematoma/seroma not requiring surgery
o Hernia[/QUOTE]
Comment