Originally posted by txmarinemom
View Post
Or am I misunderstanding that. I think Linda stated point blank that earlier shorter fusions can avoid longer later fusions. From that I take it my kids could possibly have had shorter fusions had they been fused at 40*.
Did I miss somewhere that Osumike definitely has a double major curve vs. simply a structural thoracic with a compensatory lumbar?
Furthermore, I have gotten the distinct impression that when the curves are about the same size and especially when both are relatively large, then both are structural. Maybe that is highly inaccurate though! Also, we have now between this forum and another at least 3 cases where someone had roughly equal curves and only one was fused and the other turned out to be structural. It's a ridiculously small sample size but I have yet toi read a testimonial where the curves were both large, one was fused and the other straightened out on its own which of course is not to say it never happens.
It isn't all that unusual for compensatory curves to be misread as structural by non-specialists: My original orthopedic used to always measure my lumbar curve, too ... and it's fusion-free 30 years later because it was never actually structural.
Comment