A while back, someone posted an article about a possible connection between BMP use and cancer. I just asked Dr. Boachie about this. His answer was "There is no clinical evidence of this in humans(the study was done on rats), and the benefits clearly outweigh the risks" Just wanted to share this info. with everyone.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BMP and cancer risk
Collapse
X
-
I read the same info about BMP-2 , and found it somewhat reassuring, but, I, too still worry about it.Lori in PA, 52 yrs. old
T54/L72
Surgery 6/7/11, T3-S1, all posterior, with pelvic anchors
Gained 2 inches!
Dr. Boachie, HSS, NYC
12/10/13 Hardware Removal for infection
Lost 2", gained PJK!
Comment
-
Thanks for posting Lori. I'm loaded up with BMP but Dr Bridwell said that it was safe and I've read more good than bad. (also read the tumor suppressant info) it seems that everything carries some sort of cancer risk anymore. I'm not worried. Can't imagine that all of these top surgeons would use BMP (primarily on older adults who may be at higher risk of non fusion) if it wasn't safe!Age 56
Wore a Milwaukee Brace for 3 years in hs
Fused L4-S1 for high grade spondylolisthesis Jan '09 in Indy
Thoracic 68
Surgery Aug 31, 2010 T3 to L1
Dr Bridwell St Louis
http://www.scoliosis.org/forum/attac...1&d=1289881696
Comment
-
Lisa,
I'm not going to worry about the BMP either. I am glad I have it because my main goal is to fuse! If I end up having cancer sometime in my life, I'll blame the plastic on
the Healthy Choice meals.Karen
Surgery-Jan. 5, 2011-Dr. Lenke
Fusion T-4-sacrum-2 cages/5 osteotomies
70 degree thoracolumbar corrected to 25
Rib Hump-GONE!
Age-60 at the time of surgery
Now 66
Avid Golfer & Tap Dancer
Retired Kdgn. Teacher
See photobucket link for:
Video of my 1st Day of Golf Post-Op-3/02/12-Bradenton, FL
Before and After Picture of back 1/7/11
tap dancing picture at 10 mos. post op 11/11/11-I'm the one on the right.
http://s1119.photobucket.com/albums/k630/pottoff2/
Comment
-
I love it! Good one, Karen. I really wish I were funny instead of analytical....
I'm with you guys. I'm not going to worry about the BMP. It seems like EVERYTHING causes cancer. I don't use salt, but do use lots of pepper. I read once that peppper may cause cancer. I have been using tanning lotion instead of tanning booths, and now there is info out there that says the active ingredient in the self tanners may cause cancer. I may as well just enjoy the warm sunshine!!!
You just can't do anything anymore without someone saying it is bad for you. I believe all things in moderation is the key. Just eat healthy, exercise, cut out all the stress you can, and enjoy a quality (not necessarily quantity) life!! It will be over before you know it...Jenee'-52
Bend, Oregon
Braced 3 years in high school
Lumbar 70'+ Thoracic 70'+
I had 3" shrinkage in 6 months...
Surgery Jan 10, 2011
9 hours
T3 to S1 with pelvic fixation
Both curves now 35'
Possible revison for Flatback Syndrome
Non-fusion
Loose/broken hardware-awaiting CT results
Here is the link to my before and after pics..
http://www.scoliosis.org/forum/showt......&highlight=
Comment
-
Self tanners too! Darn. JanetJanet
61 years old--57 for surgery
Diagnosed in 1965 at age of 13--no brace
Thoracic Curve: 96 degrees to 35 degrees
Lumbar Curve: 63 degrees to 5 degrees
Surgery with Dr. Lenke in St. Louis--March 30, 2009
T-2 to Pelvis, and hopefully all posterior procedure.
All was posterior along with 2 cages and 6 osteotomies.
Comment
-
Hi all,
I asked Dr. Lenke about this, too. He said that the original study used a much higher concentration in rats than is used in humans. Also that of course some scoli patients will get cancer (as it is so prevalent in the entire population), and that it would probably take decades to determine whether there is a link between BMP and cancer in humans. He said it might not be determined "in our lifetimes." Also he said that if he were having the operation himself he would definitely opt for BMP. It cuts the risk of non-fusion dramatically. I'm going for it!
,
Evelynage 48
80* thoracolumbar; 40* thoracic
Reduced to ~16* thoracolumbar; ~0* thoracic
Surgery 3/14/12 with Dr. Lenke in St. Louis, T4 to S1 with pelvic fixation
Broken rods 12/1/19; scheduled for revision fusion L1-L3-4 with Dr. Lenke 2/4/2020
Not "confused" anymore, but don't know how to change my username.
Comment
-
Yes, I would definitely want it if I was having this surgery. Fusion is what it's all about. Risks are everywhere.Surgery March 3, 2009 at almost 58, now 63.
Dr. Askin, Brisbane, Australia
T4-Pelvis, Posterior only
Osteotomies and Laminectomies
Was 68 degrees, now 22 and pain free
Comment
-
Cancer, Medtronic and BMP
My brother just sent me this article and I was wondering what you all think? Do all surgeons use BMP?
http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/wat...132391068.html
Doctors didn't disclose spine product cancer risk in journal
Spine-product paper omitted key data
By John Fauber of the Journal Sentinel
Doctors paid millions of dollars by Medtronic failed to identify a significant cancer risk with the company's spine surgery product in a 2009 paper about results of a large clinical trial.
The surgeons left out important data and claimed there was no significant link between the product and cancer.
The company and doctors had become aware of information on an additional cancer case, which pushed the concern to a critical level, at least two months before the paper was published, a Journal Sentinel/MedPage Today investigation found. Independent researchers say they had an ethical duty to report the cancer risk.
The breach is the latest conflict-of-interest controversy facing Medtronic, which is under investigation by a U.S. Senate committee and the U.S. Justice Department for its marketing of the spine surgery product known as bone morphogenetic protein-2, or BMP-2.
The product is the bone growth stimulating biological agent used in the company's Infuse, which has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and Amplify, the unapproved product that was the subject of the 2009 paper.
................
First, the paper said there were eight patients who were diagnosed with cancer 24 months after being treated with Amplify, compared with two patients who got the standard treatment - a graft of their own hip bone. That resulted in the probability of a real cancer risk that fell a little short of what is considered statistically significant.
However, the actual cancer numbers were nine for those receiving Amplify and two for those who received bone grafts, according to the FDA records. At nine patients the cancer risk becomes significant, based on the way it is measured.
The ninth case involved a woman in the trial who underwent surgery with Amplify in 2003 and was diagnosed with stomach cancer in 2005. The patient did not report the cancer to researchers until her five-year follow-up in 2009.
In addition, cancer cases occurring three years after Amplify was implanted showed a clear statistical significance, said Brook Martin, a researcher with Dartmouth Medical School who analyzed the data for the Journal Sentinel. That data indicates that 12 patients had been diagnosed with cancer in the Amplify group, compared with three who got their own hip bone.
Martin said the authors had an ethical obligation to report all the cancer information.
"It absolutely should be presented, in my view," he said.
A three-year analysis was not done because that time point was not pre-specified, Marybeth Thorsgaard, a Medtronic spokeswoman, said in an email.
Thorsgaard and the paper's lead author said the ninth cancer patient wasn't discovered until after the paper had been accepted for publication in the journal, but they refused to provide the date. Thorsgaard said that when the company became aware of the case, it reported to the FDA in an April 2009 update.
That was at least two months before the paper actually was published. Neither Medtronic nor the authors could point to any evidence they moved to update the paper to reflect the accurate and more alarming cancer report.30 y.o female, very active, considering surgery
08/03/11 - 54 degrees
06/2004 - 33 degrees
Don't like hospitals
Comment
-
I have done a lot of research on this subject, as it was also a big concern of mine prior to my surgery. The article is talking about BMP-2, or Amplify, not BMP-1, Infuse, which is what the surgeons use. BMP-2 has not gotten FDA approval yet. I have read all the reports of the researchers under reporting the side effects associated with Infuse, which is under investigation by the FDA. I spoke to Dr. Boachie about my concerns, and he feels it is safe, and has never seen any ill effects from it with his pts. I elected to have it, even with my history of thyroid cancer, because the thought of more surgery because of non-fusion scares me more.Lori in PA, 52 yrs. old
T54/L72
Surgery 6/7/11, T3-S1, all posterior, with pelvic anchors
Gained 2 inches!
Dr. Boachie, HSS, NYC
12/10/13 Hardware Removal for infection
Lost 2", gained PJK!
Comment
-
Dr. Lenke will not do surgery with out using BMP. He said BMP provides a 23% faster/stronger fusion which means less issues for his patients in the future.
Warmly,
Doreen44 years old at time of surgery, Atlanta GA
Pre-Surgery Thorasic: 70 degrees, Pre-Surgery Lumbar: 68 degrees, lost 4 inches of height in 2011
Post-Surgery curves ~10 degrees, regained 4 inches of height
Posterior T3-sacrum & TLIF surgeries on Nov 28, 2011 with Dr. Lenke, St. Louis
2 rods, 33 screws, 2 cages, 2 connectors, living a new life I never dreamed of!
http://thebionicachronicles.blogspot.com/
Comment
-
Hi Lori...
I think BMP-2 is INFUSE. No?
I'm in clinic today and we have been talking about INFUSE all day today. A patient (in Florida) who had a bad outcome, has now sued Medtronic because the problem is believed to have been caused by INFUSE. However, the surgeon used INFUSE in a TLIF, which is an off-label use. While I absolutely know it's wrong for a manufacturer to pay consultants to do favorable research, at the moment, there's quite a bit of controversy over whether or not complications were under-reported, which is supposedly the issue (reported recently by Carragee, et. al.) If this patient wins her suit, the flood gates will open, and thousands of lawsuits, or more probably, a class action suit, will probably be filed. This all ends up costing you and me a huge amount of our healthcare $. It could also mean that INFUSE is taken off the market, which could result in a lot more bad outcomes, and certainly a longer recovery time for people needing long fusions to the sacrum.
--LindaNever argue with an idiot. They always drag you down to their level, and then they beat you with experience. --Twain
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surgery 2/10/93 A/P fusion T4-L3
Surgery 1/20/11 A/P fusion L2-sacrum w/pelvic fixation
Comment
-
My surgeon also will not do a fusion without BMP, at least not the kind of fusion I need.
One thing we all have to accept is that we have a potentially life-threatening progressive condition that requires fairly drastic action to combat. We have to make some tough choices. BMP will greatly increase the chances of successful fusion, and speed recovery. Our surgeons will likely insist on it, but should that make you feel confident it's safe in the long term? Not really...because you have to remember these are highly specialized spine surgeons. Their focus is on creating a successful fusion on a corrected spine. That is what they do and all they do, and they will choose the best tools for their job. I wouldn't really expect my surgeon to be that concerned with my overall health down the road. Neither do I expect that he would choose to use something that had a significant chance of causing cancer...but again, I understand what his priority is and where his focus is in treating me.
I will accept the risk because very little scares me more than a failure to fuse.Stephanie, age 56
Diagnosed age 8
Milwaukee brace 9 years, no further treatment, symptom free and clueless until my 40s that curves could progress.
Thoracolumbar curve 39 degrees at age 17
Now somewhere around 58 degrees thoracic, 70 degrees thoracolumbar
Surgeon Dr. Michael S. O'Brien, Baylor's Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas TX
Bilateral laminectomies at L3 to L4, L4 to L5 and L5 to S1 on April 4, 2012
Foramenotomies L3 through S1 in August 2014
Comment
Comment