Sharon,
#76 [Rohrer] I honestly don't think you have AIS.
#77 [Pooka] I agree with Rohrer that is probably isn't AIS but who knows.
#109 [Pooka] You have the most common type and size curve for AIS (small T curve) if it isn't just a functional curve.
#120 [Pooka] You are a textbook AIS.
So see Sharon you contradict yourself as well, (some have said I do, I think I just don't explain myself that well sometimes, but maybe at times I have)
Straight away there's an exception to the rule when rkochis says he too has a LLD related to his scoliosis.
Its hard for me to believe his curves at 63 degrees and 48 degeres are going to bend out or that the LLD wasnt a contributing factor in his scoliosis progression.
And for all the things you argued with me on in your first reply, the one thing you didn't bring up was about whether or not if a structural problem begins in scoliosis where its a concave or convex or both.
You avoided that, but answered everything else like an authority on it.
It annoys me that no-one ever says "What Scott is saying actually does kind of make logical sense. If hes wrong, and only has propreoception than his creative mind has done quite an amazing job."
Not only that you all claim 'proprioception' as why I must be wrong, and I feel like you are treating me like a teenager in a growing body, not the adult in a skeletally mature spine I was when this 'injury' I allege started.
You say that you are trying to help me learn something Sharon but all you are essentially doing is infuriating me, and you know it, and you do it on purpose.
I feel like I have to do battle with you every time I come here just for the right to be myself, It's no wonder I always leave.
I'm better off getting no support at all than having to deal with you, that's the honest truth.
I could argue back and forth with your earlier points but honestly that's a merry go round I've decided to take control of by choosing to get off.
You can choose to think you won if you want to, but technically I win because I wont have to put up with you anymore.
I never even get a chance to get comfortable and take the time I'd like to properly to respond to others because I'm always constantly having to defend myself against you.
I'm going to respectfully ask you Sharon from now on keep your opinions to yourself.
You could actually provide support and use the scoliosis knowledge you have to help me in a constructive way but you choose not to.
You could look for and find the papers where it was hypothesized about lordosis in kyphosis, or find other ways to help like providing feedback on my website for example but you'd rather constantly argue with me in a manner that constantly infers that I must be wrong and must be losing it when the real truth is that none of you have actually taken a good look and feel of my spine to know exactly what it is I'm trying to show and describe to you.
I'm not going around in circles with you anymore.
Really if you cannot be open minded, and also offer a path to see my claims proven wrong then you shouldn't automatically imply that I'm mistaken and jump to the conclusions that I'm not thinking clearly and continue to imply that and inflame things with me.
Also its not fair that you use 'science' to consistently refute my claims about my own scoliosis when I don't have access to or the means to the scientific tools that could prove I'm right, and you don't advocate for that, do you? No.
This is supposed to be a support group and what I get from you is the exact opposite.
Please don't post on the thread I started of 'My Adult Scoliosis Story'
I didn't choose to have scoliosis, but I can choose for YOU NOT to be in THAT story, so get lost, and 'whatever...' to any forthcoming retort you come up with in advance.
Don't bother, because I don't care.
#76 [Rohrer] I honestly don't think you have AIS.
#77 [Pooka] I agree with Rohrer that is probably isn't AIS but who knows.
#109 [Pooka] You have the most common type and size curve for AIS (small T curve) if it isn't just a functional curve.
#120 [Pooka] You are a textbook AIS.
So see Sharon you contradict yourself as well, (some have said I do, I think I just don't explain myself that well sometimes, but maybe at times I have)
Straight away there's an exception to the rule when rkochis says he too has a LLD related to his scoliosis.
Its hard for me to believe his curves at 63 degrees and 48 degeres are going to bend out or that the LLD wasnt a contributing factor in his scoliosis progression.
And for all the things you argued with me on in your first reply, the one thing you didn't bring up was about whether or not if a structural problem begins in scoliosis where its a concave or convex or both.
You avoided that, but answered everything else like an authority on it.
It annoys me that no-one ever says "What Scott is saying actually does kind of make logical sense. If hes wrong, and only has propreoception than his creative mind has done quite an amazing job."
Not only that you all claim 'proprioception' as why I must be wrong, and I feel like you are treating me like a teenager in a growing body, not the adult in a skeletally mature spine I was when this 'injury' I allege started.
You say that you are trying to help me learn something Sharon but all you are essentially doing is infuriating me, and you know it, and you do it on purpose.
I feel like I have to do battle with you every time I come here just for the right to be myself, It's no wonder I always leave.
I'm better off getting no support at all than having to deal with you, that's the honest truth.
I could argue back and forth with your earlier points but honestly that's a merry go round I've decided to take control of by choosing to get off.
You can choose to think you won if you want to, but technically I win because I wont have to put up with you anymore.
I never even get a chance to get comfortable and take the time I'd like to properly to respond to others because I'm always constantly having to defend myself against you.
I'm going to respectfully ask you Sharon from now on keep your opinions to yourself.
You could actually provide support and use the scoliosis knowledge you have to help me in a constructive way but you choose not to.
You could look for and find the papers where it was hypothesized about lordosis in kyphosis, or find other ways to help like providing feedback on my website for example but you'd rather constantly argue with me in a manner that constantly infers that I must be wrong and must be losing it when the real truth is that none of you have actually taken a good look and feel of my spine to know exactly what it is I'm trying to show and describe to you.
I'm not going around in circles with you anymore.
Really if you cannot be open minded, and also offer a path to see my claims proven wrong then you shouldn't automatically imply that I'm mistaken and jump to the conclusions that I'm not thinking clearly and continue to imply that and inflame things with me.
Also its not fair that you use 'science' to consistently refute my claims about my own scoliosis when I don't have access to or the means to the scientific tools that could prove I'm right, and you don't advocate for that, do you? No.
This is supposed to be a support group and what I get from you is the exact opposite.
Please don't post on the thread I started of 'My Adult Scoliosis Story'
I didn't choose to have scoliosis, but I can choose for YOU NOT to be in THAT story, so get lost, and 'whatever...' to any forthcoming retort you come up with in advance.
Don't bother, because I don't care.
Comment