Your response on Fix's forum (ETA: and here) in re first degree relatives is NOT to a published article. It is to Dingo's fatally flawed little bunny analysis that he wrote to look like a published abstract and posted here and a few other places. It is now leading the blind on at least two other fora because they don't realize it is not a published article but rather the fatally flawed analysis of a lay untrained person.
And Dingo is NOT correcting people when they assume it is a published article rather than his own thoughts made to look like a published article. It is dishonest. If lay untrained folks could produce real knowledge then we wouldn't need PhD programs or peer review. This is an example of that.
Note how there is no citation.
And Dingo is NOT correcting people when they assume it is a published article rather than his own thoughts made to look like a published article. It is dishonest. If lay untrained folks could produce real knowledge then we wouldn't need PhD programs or peer review. This is an example of that.
Note how there is no citation.
Comment