Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Money Driven Medicine

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    494

    Money Driven Medicine

    I ran across something that may be of interest to some folks. I was reading up about the doctor Dingo interviewed and came across a chapter from an online book which mentions one of his colleagues. The book is “Money Driven Medicine” and the Chapter posted on the web is Chapter 8: Device Makers, Drug Makers and the FDA. (The book received very good reviews from most Amazon reviewers)

    I have not read the whole thing, but the first 15 or so pages of this chapter discuss issues related to the FDA and spinal device manufacturers, specifically a certain disc replacement device. The fellow from UC Irvine looks to me like the “good guy” in this controversy.

    The chapter offers an interesting perspective, almost from the “inside” about the world of orthopedic surgery and the ethical challenges these folks face.

    Searching further, I found a paper written by both the doctor Dingo interviewed and his colleague discussed in the Money Driven Medicine chapter. It too is very interesting but should be read second (after the first 15 pages of the Chapter). I don’t pretend to understand much of what is covered in the paper, but expect some of the folks who are more familiar with spine surgery may better comprehend it. I did understand the last part of the conclusions where they say:
    The regulatory function of the FDA to provide for the safety and efficacy of devices has been breached in this case. The authors believe this may be due to the inappropriate influence of industry on both the researchers and the approval process.

    Previously, I posted an abstract to a paper in Spine Journal “Is the Spine Field a Mine Field”. This sort of relates to that.

    I offer this for discussion hoping that it is not controversial.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    948

    disc replacements

    Yep, Kiester said that he understood why today's Lumbar disc replacements didn't work properly. I guess they don't work the way the back works.

    "His research on how the lumbar spine (low back) rotates helps explain why the lumbar artificial disk replacements have had such poor results"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    195
    It really is very scary. As a parent, you really can't know who to trust and who really has the "best interest" of your child and not the all mighty dollar in mind.
    Emily's mom-11 1/2 years old
    28 degree scoliosis 9/04
    Chiari Malformation/SM decompressed 11/04
    17-24 degrees 11/04-6/07
    Wearing Spinecor Brace since June 07
    3/31/10- 29 degrees oob
    11/18/09 17 degrees in brace

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    8,901
    I didn't read the articles yet but don't these surgeons get an annual salary that isn't tied into the exact number of procedures? The professorships come with a flat salary, yes?

    Now I'm wondering.
    Sharon, mother of identical twin girls with scoliosis

    No island of sanity.

    Question: What do you call alternative medicine that works?
    Answer: Medicine


    "We are all African."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    8,901
    Quote Originally Posted by concerned dad View Post
    I ran across something that may be of interest to some folks. I was reading up about the doctor Dingo interviewed and came across a chapter from an online book which mentions one of his colleagues. The book is “Money Driven Medicine” and the Chapter posted on the web is Chapter 8: Device Makers, Drug Makers and the FDA. (The book received very good reviews from most Amazon reviewers)
    From that chapter...

    “The speaker warned us that we had better get used to evidence-based medicine, because it’s here to stay,” Rosen remembers. “And he suggested that if physicians didn’t deal with it, other people would bring it up.”

    I certainly hope so.

    CD wrote...

    I have not read the whole thing, but the first 15 or so pages of this chapter discuss issues related to the FDA and spinal device manufacturers, specifically a certain disc replacement device. The fellow from UC Irvine looks to me like the “good guy” in this controversy.

    The chapter offers an interesting perspective, almost from the “inside” about the world of orthopedic surgery and the ethical challenges these folks face.
    The FDA slipped a number of times, all related to Bush's War on Science. They were making decisions NOT based on science, they muzzled government scientists, etc.

    CD wrote...

    Searching further, I found a paper written by both the doctor Dingo interviewed and his colleague discussed in the Money Driven Medicine chapter. It too is very interesting but should be read second (after the first 15 pages of the Chapter). I don’t pretend to understand much of what is covered in the paper, but expect some of the folks who are more familiar with spine surgery may better comprehend it. I did understand the last part of the conclusions where they say:
    The regulatory function of the FDA to provide for the safety and efficacy of devices has been breached in this case. The authors believe this may be due to the inappropriate influence of industry on both the researchers and the approval process.
    Again, Bush's War on Science. President Obama has vowed to put science back front and center where it belongs.

    CD wrote...

    Previously, I posted an abstract to a paper in Spine Journal “Is the Spine Field a Mine Field”. This sort of relates to that.
    From that citation...

    A recent commentary in JAMA labeled the current system of industry-sponsored clinical research as “broken” and suggested that clinicians can no longer rely on the medical literature for valid and reliable information.47

    (That last paragraph is especially for Sharon)
    That is one very important though by no means the only reason the literature is a mess. I'm just saying I know zip about orthopedics and medicine and can spot elementary problems with most papers I have read. That is shocking to me if nobody else.

    If there is a runaway train here, I wish the journal editors would do more to put the brakes on this stuff. Or start retracting papers after the fact. Something. Publishing uncontrolled studies has got to stop yesterday. It seems like this is the last outpost of science that hasn't gotten the news about the necessity of controlled studies. I need to reorient myself after reading these scoli papers when I pick up a journal article in my field.
    Sharon, mother of identical twin girls with scoliosis

    No island of sanity.

    Question: What do you call alternative medicine that works?
    Answer: Medicine


    "We are all African."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    6,795
    From that chapter...

    “The speaker warned us that we had better get used to evidence-based medicine, because it’s here to stay,” Rosen remembers. “And he suggested that if physicians didn’t deal with it, other people would bring it up.”


    I was at a spine symposium at UCSF at the end of last week. Dr. Daniel Resnick spoke on just this subject. It's interesting to me that the things that are getting looked at are from mainstream medicine. As far as I can tell, alternative procedures are flying under the radar.

    If you're really interested in this topic, I read a VERY long article this morning by Atul Gawande (author of one of my favorite books, "Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science.") You can read the article here:

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...urrentPage=all

    Regards,
    Linda

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14
    In any profession there are corrupt individuals. I would say, in my experience, most money driven people would not become pediatric subspecialists. In any medical specialty, the adult version inevitably makes more money. Also, I could argue that most people with the ability to make it through 4 yrs of med school and 5-8 years of fellowship/residency, probably has the ability to make a lot more money with a lot less work/call/responsibility in another field.

    Evidence based medicine and rcts sound great and are ideal. But I know personally that if I only used FDA approved drugs for approved purposes and with ebm behind them, I would not be able to treat 90 percent of kids with epilepsy... Parents do not like to place their kids in studies, understandably so.

    You have to have a good relationship with your doctor- find one that you can trust. I don't think it's naive to believe that the majority are still trying to do what's right for their pts.

    Just my opinion...d

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    494
    mmm2001
    I agree. I saw an interesting program on TV the other night and they compared the salaries of top surgeons (I think they said they were neurosurgeons) and they made a fraction of what the top people in the financial world make (still, not chump change).

    I suppose the point of my post was that the Spine field, in particular, seems to be more susceptible to allegations of corruption. As the author of the paper in Spine noted, this is not where they “want to be”. Poor decisions by a few can cast a shadow over many.

    Regarding the example you posted about going off label to assist your patients, that’s fine. Your decision is based on your knowledge and experience. However, I’m sure you would agree that if the off label product happens to be something you are financially tied to, well, that should at least be disclosed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14
    I agree with that 100%. I personally am not tied to any pharma co- won't speak for them, won't take their money. But if I were, I would certainly disclose, and anyone should.

    Neurosurgeons don't do too badly- but let's face it, their job is insane. Imagine the risk/requirements of being able to do surgery in such a delicate area. One of the peds neurosurg's at our hospital is at work about 20 hrs a day- on call 1 of every 3 weeks. Hourly, I bet his salary is none too impressive considering the training (15 years if you count college) and risk.

    I'm not whining- we all have the ability to chose what we want to do. I love my job. But docs get bashed a lot now-a-days, and I would like people to know there is another side to it.

    Still, we must weed out unscrupulous physicians, because it makes everyone look bad. Full disclosure is very important. I personally never really appreciated surgeons until my daughter decided to grow crooked- now I'm very thankful for them. (Well, at least one of them...)

    : )

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Houston TX
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by emarismom View Post
    It really is very scary. As a parent, you really can't know who to trust and who really has the "best interest" of your child and not the all mighty dollar in mind.
    The ONLY person with your child's best interest in mind is you--the parent. Others think they know what is right or good, but the only person who really has a vested interest in the outcome for YOUR child is you.

    That is why I like our health care system in the US. If I don't like a specific treatment, I can spend my money somewhere else. I get to decide what is good or right for me in my situation--not what the general consensus of doctors think or what is the current trend or, heaven forbid, what the government thinks is right for me.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,090
    PNUTTRO,

    Great post! Totally agree with your thoughts.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    93
    PNUTTRO I agree with the jist of your comment but lots of people don't have money for choosing which doctor or treatment to use. In NY (and maybe everywhere) the most highly thought of spine doctors don't take insurance (or only a couple of fancy plans)--you have to pay out of pocket. This has lead to a disagreement between my husband and me. I want to go to the highly recommended Boacie, at least for a consult, but my husband says why get started with someone we can't afford, even if he is the best?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    494
    I ran across the newspaper article that is referenced in the Spine paper "Is the Spine Field a Mine Field" . Pretty disturbing.


    From another news article by the same author:
    Spinal-fusion surgery is one of the most lucrative areas of medicine. An estimated half-million Americans had the operation this year, generating billions of dollars for hospitals and doctors.

    But there have been serious questions about how much the surgery actually helps patients with back pain and whether surgeons' generous fees might motivate them to overuse the procedure. Those concerns are now heightened by a growing trend among some surgeons to profit in yet another way -- by investing in companies that make screws and other hardware they install.

    The parts can be highly profitable. A single screw that goes into the spine, for example, sells for about $1,000 -- at least 10 times the cost of making it.


    These are pretty old. I sure hope they have their act together now. I think the recent "Is the Spine field a mine field" paper in Spine al least shows that they are aware of it and hopefully working on cleaning things up.

    further in the article they say
    Some spine surgeons are also concerned about whether they and their colleagues should enter into such arrangements. ''These are, I believe, unethical and bias the doctors' choice for what is best for the patient,'' said Dr. Charles D. Rosen, a spine surgeon at the University of California at Irvine, who is the president of the newly formed Association of Ethical Spine Surgeons. The group has about 75 members so far, who have agreed not to invest in companies whose devices they use.

    For anyone not following along closely, Rosen is a colleague of the doctor Dingo interviewed. Maybe membership in the "Association of Ethical Spine Surgeons" should be viewed in the same way we often look at SRS membership.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    948

    I finally agree with PNUTTRO on something

    PNUTTRO

    The ONLY person with your child's best interest in mind is you--the parent.
    That is why I like our health care system in the US.
    100% correct.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    8,901
    Quote Originally Posted by concerned dad View Post
    From another news article by the same author:
    Spinal-fusion surgery is one of the most lucrative areas of medicine. An estimated half-million Americans had the operation this year, generating billions of dollars for hospitals and doctors.

    But there have been serious questions about how much the surgery actually helps patients with back pain and whether surgeons' generous fees might motivate them to overuse the procedure. Those concerns are now heightened by a growing trend among some surgeons to profit in yet another way -- by investing in companies that make screws and other hardware they install.

    The parts can be highly profitable. A single screw that goes into the spine, for example, sells for about $1,000 -- at least 10 times the cost of making it.
    CD, way back before my kids developed scoliosis, I had heard that surgery, presumably including fusion, is NOT the answer for back pain. The figure I recall is that ~60% of people operated on for back pain have MORE pain afterward long-term. In other words, the state of the art of surgery to address back pain is not there apparently. This is a legitimate area for alternative treatment in my opinion if only because we have evidence surgery fails to relieve pain often.

    I think many accept that too mush surgery for back pain is going on and too much of that is not helping.

    All of that given, it is IRRELEVANT to surgery (fusion) for scoliosis and by extension back pain associated with conditions associated with scoliosis where pain is only one indicator.
    Sharon, mother of identical twin girls with scoliosis

    No island of sanity.

    Question: What do you call alternative medicine that works?
    Answer: Medicine


    "We are all African."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •