And apparently is to be used during the growth spurt as the text says
The estimation of the prognostic risk to be used during pubertal growth spurt (modified from Lonstein and Carlson [33]). The numbers in the figure indicate the number of cases that each data point is based on. Note the small number of cases on which the upper margins of the graph are based. Lonstein and Carlson's progression estimation formula is based on curves between 20 and 29 degrees
Why age would factor into it (or Risser for that matter) I dont know. Risser is 0 during (at least most of) the pubertal growth spurt. I mean, if you are Risser 4, you're not in the pubertal growth spurt. Nor are you in the 'spurt" if you are 18.
Edit - I posted this simultaneously with Laura's post above. I know it posted. I saw it. But when I went back to see Lauras post it was gone. I used IE to go <back> and got to this point to repost. Interesting aspect of VBulletin
The estimation of the prognostic risk to be used during pubertal growth spurt (modified from Lonstein and Carlson [33]). The numbers in the figure indicate the number of cases that each data point is based on. Note the small number of cases on which the upper margins of the graph are based. Lonstein and Carlson's progression estimation formula is based on curves between 20 and 29 degrees
Why age would factor into it (or Risser for that matter) I dont know. Risser is 0 during (at least most of) the pubertal growth spurt. I mean, if you are Risser 4, you're not in the pubertal growth spurt. Nor are you in the 'spurt" if you are 18.
Edit - I posted this simultaneously with Laura's post above. I know it posted. I saw it. But when I went back to see Lauras post it was gone. I used IE to go <back> and got to this point to repost. Interesting aspect of VBulletin
Comment