Gerbo,
Avoiding the issues raised once again... have you any response to my questions other than "we need studies" and "scientific medicine"? Anyhow, SI has been scientifically validated to alter physical structure and function. Why is it SOOOO hard for you to consider its applicability to scoliosis. It's just a label, not a DISEASE pal!
Actually, you would have an idea as to where to start if you had even the slightest understanding of how the brace was potentially effective. Again, studies and "science" aren't what make something, including braces, effective... If you took the time to learn a little something on your own maybe you could make a sound decision.
Now you're lumping SI into the same category as raindrop therapy, chiropractics, laying on of hands, etc??? You're absurd... Keep sitting on your hands while the curve develops... .
Avoiding the issues raised once again... have you any response to my questions other than "we need studies" and "scientific medicine"? Anyhow, SI has been scientifically validated to alter physical structure and function. Why is it SOOOO hard for you to consider its applicability to scoliosis. It's just a label, not a DISEASE pal!
(and if we wanted to consider choosing something "additional" on top of bracing , based on the persuasive say-so or personal experience or divine gifts or aggressive sales tactics of the practioner involved there is so much to choose from that one wouldn't know where to start; raindrop therapy, SI, pyramid therapy, colourtherapy, chiropracters (in lots of different shades) laying on of hands, dancing round a campfire at midnight whilst chanting traditional dutch nursery rhymes; the list of "alternatives" is endless.)
Now you're lumping SI into the same category as raindrop therapy, chiropractics, laying on of hands, etc??? You're absurd... Keep sitting on your hands while the curve develops... .
Comment